An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra
Authors:

Article info

2013-12-31
2014-11-19
1303 - 1320

Keywords

  • At Tabari's view towards Ali bin Abi Talib.
  • The greatest confusion
  • the era of omwi leadership
  • the modern analysis

Abstract

Many modern researchers have refused most of the narrations about the history of the biggest sedition (Al-Fitna Al-Kobra) (35-40H.). This rejection originates from their intellectual formation. This rejection of these narrations also necessitated defaming most of the sedition's narrators such as Abo Mekhnef (died in 157 H.), AlWaqidi (died in 207 H.) as well as the senior historians who collected these narrations such as Ibn Qutaiba (died in 286 H.), Al-Balathri (died in 279 H.) and even implicitly or explicitly Al-Tabari (died in 310 H.). Many traditional researchers have established this rejection despite the differences in motives and reasons. The traditional analysis of Al-Fitna history stemmed from the assumption that these narrations were an attempt to defame Islamic history, which is connected with the formative bases of Islam according to the sectarian vision. By contrast, the modern\ intellectual analysis originated from a contrary basis in an attempt to negate the narrations that show the truth of the historical transformation after Al-Fitna Al-Kobra (35-40 H). This historical transformation involved the end of the orthodox caliphate which was related to the prophecy history. This is due to the fact that modern analysis sees the Umayyad period or some of its components as a state of breaking off from the fundamental religious status towards the reality of the tribe and profit and its natural, historical development.

Recommended Citation

Jaradat, M. (2015). Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 29(7), 1303–1320. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004
[1]M. Jaradat, “Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra,” An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1303–1320, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.35552/0247-029-007-004.
Jaradat, Mohammed. “Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra.” An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), vol. 29, no. 7, July 2015, pp. 1303–20. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004.
1.Jaradat M. Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) [Internet]. 2015 Jul;29(7):1303–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004
Jaradat, Mohammed. “Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra.” An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) 29, no. 7 (July 2015): 1303–20. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004.

قراءة نقدية لموقف التحليل الحداثي من روايات الفتنة الكبرى (35-40هـ.)
المؤلفون:

معلومات المقال

2013-12-31
2014-11-19
1303 - 1320

الكلمات الإفتتاحية

  • At Tabari's view towards Ali bin Abi Talib.
  • The greatest confusion
  • the era of omwi leadership
  • the modern analysis

الملخص

رفض كثير من الباحثين الحداثيّين، أكثر روايات تاريخ الفتنة الكبرى (35-40هـ.)، انطلاقاً من طبيعة تكوينهم الفكري، وتطلب رفض هذه الروايات الطعن في معظم رواتها، كأبي مخنف (ت157هـ) والواقدي (ت207هـ)، ليطال جامعو هذه الروايات من كبار المؤرخين، كابن قتيبة (ت286هـ) والبلاذري (ت279هـ)، بل والطبري (ت310هـ)، تلميحاً وتصريحاً. وكان كثير من الباحثين التقليديّين، أسّسوا لهذا الرفض، رغم اختلاف الدوافع والمنطلقات، ففيما انطلق التحليل التقليدي لتاريخ الفتنة من اعتبار هذه الروايات محاولة لتشويه التاريخ الإسلامي، وهو تاريخ متصل بالأسس التكوينية للإسلام، وفق التصور المذهبي، نجد التحليل الحداثي/العقلاني انطلق من نقيض ذلك، في محاولة منه لنفي الروايات التي تظهر حقيقة النقلة التاريخية بعد الفتنة الكبرى (35-40هـ)، والتي انتهت عقبها مرحلة الخلافة الراشدة المتصلة بتاريخ النبوة، باعتبار أنّ التحليل الحداثي يرى بالعهد الأموي، أو بعض مكوناته، حالة من الافتراق مع الطابع الديني الأصولي، باتجاه ما أعتبروه، واقعية القبيلة والغنيمة، وتطورها التاريخي الطبيعي.

Recommended Citation

Jaradat, M. (2015). Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 29(7), 1303–1320. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004
[1]M. Jaradat, “Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra,” An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1303–1320, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.35552/0247-029-007-004.
Jaradat, Mohammed. “Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra.” An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), vol. 29, no. 7, July 2015, pp. 1303–20. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004.
1.Jaradat M. Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) [Internet]. 2015 Jul;29(7):1303–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004
Jaradat, Mohammed. “Critical Reading of the Position Analyze Modernist Novels of the Biggest Sedition (35-40) For Hijra.” An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) 29, no. 7 (July 2015): 1303–20. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-029-007-004.

An-Najah National University
Nablus, Palestine
P.O. Box
7, 707
Fax
(970)(9)2345982
Tel.
(970)(9)2345560
(970)(9)2345113/5/6/7-Ext. 2628
E-mail
[email protected]
EIC
Prof. Ismail Warad