An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Scopus

Scopus profile and journal metrics

This journal is indexed in Scopus. Use these metrics for a quick publishing snapshot, then open the Scopus page for the authoritative profile.

Scopus
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Indexed in Scopus since 2019
CiteScore 0.9
Indexed since 2019
First decision 10 Days
Submission to acceptance 90 Days
Acceptance to publication 15 Days
Acceptance rate 4%

SCImago

SCImago Journal Rank preview

Use SCImago when you want a quick visual view of the journal ranking profile and external discoverability signals.

An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) SCImago Journal & Country Rank

DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals listing

The DOAJ record is useful for readers, librarians, and authors who want a direct open-access directory entry for the journal.

DOAJ
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Open directory record
original_full_paper

Methods of Teaching Islamic Fiqh

Published
2000-11-11
Pages
59 - 88
Full text

Abstract

This paper examined the most important methods used in the teaching of Islamic fiqh at the university level. The paper identified two types of methods: old and modern. It also prounded a criticism of both types of methods and highlighted their advantages and disadvantages. The study particularly highlighted the Islamic perception of these methods and the optimal characteristics of a fiqh instructor. The paper concluded with a number of suggestions and recommendations that may correct the course of university teaching of Islamic fiqh. The paper mainly calls for the need to diagnose the causes of students’ weaknesses in this field and to find solutions to these causes.

Article history

Received
1999-09-20
Accepted
2000-11-11
Available online
2000-11-11
original_full_paper

Methods of Teaching Islamic Fiqh

Published
2000-11-11
الصفحات
59 - 88
البحث كاملا

الملخص

This paper examined the most important methods used in the teaching of Islamic fiqh at the university level. The paper identified two types of methods: old and modern. It also prounded a criticism of both types of methods and highlighted their advantages and disadvantages. The study particularly highlighted the Islamic perception of these methods and the optimal characteristics of a fiqh instructor. The paper concluded with a number of suggestions and recommendations that may correct the course of university teaching of Islamic fiqh. The paper mainly calls for the need to diagnose the causes of students’ weaknesses in this field and to find solutions to these causes.

Article history

تاريخ التسليم
1999-09-20
تاريخ القبول
2000-11-11
Available online
2000-11-11