An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

Metrics and turnaround details

First decision 10 Days
Submission to acceptance 90 Days
Acceptance to publication 15 Days
Acceptance rate 4%

Scopus

Scopus profile

This journal is indexed in Scopus. Use these metrics for a quick publishing snapshot, then open the Scopus page for the authoritative profile.

Scopus
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Indexed in Scopus since 2019
CiteScore 0.9
Indexed since 2019

SCImago

SCImago Journal Rank preview

Use SCImago when you want a quick visual view of the journal ranking profile and external discoverability signals.

An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) SCImago Journal & Country Rank

DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals listing

The DOAJ record is useful for readers, librarians, and authors who want a direct open-access directory entry for the journal.

DOAJ
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Open directory record
original_full_paper

The Effect of the Brainstorming Teaching Method on UNRWA- FES ‎Students' Achievement and their Critical Thinking in the Geography ‎Course

Published
2008-08-04
Pages
1447 - 1480
Full text

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effect of the brainstorming ‎teaching method on Faculty of Educational Sciences (FES) students' ‎achievement and on improving their critical thinking in the geography ‎course. The population of the study consisted of (131) male and female ‎Class Teacher sophomore students, distributed among five classes. Two ‎classes were randomly selected to form two cluster groups; an ‎experimental group and a control group. The experimental group ‎consisted of (25) male and female students while the control group ‎consisted of (28) male and female students. An achievement multiple ‎choice test designed by the researcher mainly for the purpose of ‎conducting the study was administered. The said test consisted of (40) ‎items. The validity and reliability of the test was checked. Furthermore, ‎the researcher used the California Critical Thinking Test (version 2000) ‎which consisted of (34) items distributed among five skills. The ‎equivalence of the two groups was tested by applying the achievement ‎pre-test and the California Critical Thinking Test (CCTT). Results of the ‎achievement posttest, the California Critical Thinking Post Test and the ‎whole test for the analytical , inductive and evaluation skills revealed that ‎there were statistically significant differences at (α≤0.05) in favor of the ‎experimental group which were taught using the brainstorming teaching ‎method. However, the results revealed that there were statistically no ‎significant differences between the two groups with respect to the ‎deductive and reasoning skills.‎

Article history

Received
2008-02-18
Accepted
2008-08-04
Available online
2008-08-04
original_full_paper

The Effect of the Brainstorming Teaching Method on UNRWA- FES ‎Students' Achievement and their Critical Thinking in the Geography ‎Course

Published
2008-08-04
الصفحات
1447 - 1480
البحث كاملا

الملخص

The study aimed to investigate the effect of the brainstorming ‎teaching method on Faculty of Educational Sciences (FES) students' ‎achievement and on improving their critical thinking in the geography ‎course. The population of the study consisted of (131) male and female ‎Class Teacher sophomore students, distributed among five classes. Two ‎classes were randomly selected to form two cluster groups; an ‎experimental group and a control group. The experimental group ‎consisted of (25) male and female students while the control group ‎consisted of (28) male and female students. An achievement multiple ‎choice test designed by the researcher mainly for the purpose of ‎conducting the study was administered. The said test consisted of (40) ‎items. The validity and reliability of the test was checked. Furthermore, ‎the researcher used the California Critical Thinking Test (version 2000) ‎which consisted of (34) items distributed among five skills. The ‎equivalence of the two groups was tested by applying the achievement ‎pre-test and the California Critical Thinking Test (CCTT). Results of the ‎achievement posttest, the California Critical Thinking Post Test and the ‎whole test for the analytical , inductive and evaluation skills revealed that ‎there were statistically significant differences at (α≤0.05) in favor of the ‎experimental group which were taught using the brainstorming teaching ‎method. However, the results revealed that there were statistically no ‎significant differences between the two groups with respect to the ‎deductive and reasoning skills.‎

Article history

تاريخ التسليم
2008-02-18
تاريخ القبول
2008-08-04
Available online
2008-08-04