An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Scopus

Scopus profile and journal metrics

This journal is indexed in Scopus. Use these metrics for a quick publishing snapshot, then open the Scopus page for the authoritative profile.

Scopus
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Indexed in Scopus since 2019
CiteScore 0.9
Indexed since 2019
First decision 10 Days
Submission to acceptance 90 Days
Acceptance to publication 15 Days
Acceptance rate 4%

SCImago

SCImago Journal Rank preview

Use SCImago when you want a quick visual view of the journal ranking profile and external discoverability signals.

An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) SCImago Journal & Country Rank

DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals listing

The DOAJ record is useful for readers, librarians, and authors who want a direct open-access directory entry for the journal.

DOAJ
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Open directory record
Original full research article

The Claims of the Lying Musailimah in his Analogues of the Verses of the Holy Qur'an: A Critical Study

Published
2011-05-23
Pages
1643 - 1680
Full text

Abstract

This research paper sketches the claims of the lying Musailimah that his analogues of the verses of the Holy Qur'an were divinely inspired. These analogues were poor in style, diction and content. This has led some researchers to doubt their authenticity and ascription to Musailimah. The researcher discusses the claims of these critics, then studies the analogues of Musailimah from the point of view of their narration and concludes with a critiquing of some samples of such analogues.

Article history

Received
2010-10-27
Accepted
2011-05-23
Available online
2011-05-23
بحث أصيل كامل

مزاعم مسيلمة الكذاب في معارضة آيات الكتاب - دراسة تحليلية نقدية

Published
2011-05-23
الصفحات
1643 - 1680
البحث كاملا

الملخص

يعرض هذا البحث معظم الأقوال التي جاء بها مسيلمة الكذاب، وزعم أنها وحي من الله تعالى، وقد جاءت هذه المعارضات ركيكة المباني، سقيمة المعاني مما جعل بعض العلماء يشككون في صحة نسبتها إلى مسيلمة الكذاب، فعرض البحث أقوال المشككين وناقشها، ودرس معارضات مسيلمة من حيث الرواية، وأثبت صحة نسبة أصولها إلى مسيلمة، وختم بنقد نماذج منها.

Article history

تاريخ التسليم
2010-10-27
تاريخ القبول
2011-05-23
Available online
2011-05-23