An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Scopus

Scopus profile and journal metrics

This journal is indexed in Scopus. Use these metrics for a quick publishing snapshot, then open the Scopus page for the authoritative profile.

Scopus
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Indexed in Scopus since 2019
CiteScore 0.9
Indexed since 2019
First decision 10 Days
Submission to acceptance 90 Days
Acceptance to publication 15 Days
Acceptance rate 4%

SCImago

SCImago Journal Rank preview

Use SCImago when you want a quick visual view of the journal ranking profile and external discoverability signals.

An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) SCImago Journal & Country Rank

DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals listing

The DOAJ record is useful for readers, librarians, and authors who want a direct open-access directory entry for the journal.

DOAJ
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Open directory record
Original full research article

Feedback Revisited: The Impact of Peer Commentary on Students’ Attitudes and Writing Performance in the EFL Classroom

Published
2014-04-23
Pages
369 - 402
Full text

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to delve into young learners’ perceptions towards peer feedback which is used during the applicability of the “process writing” approach in learning English as a foreign language as well as the impact of peer review on their writing performance. To this end, a study was conducted at the sixth grade of two Greek state primary schools involving two experimental (44 students) and two control (46 students) groups. Entry and exit questionnaires were administered to the participants of the study in order to explore their perceptions in the beginning and the end of the research and trace any differences due to the intervention, regarding both inter-group and intra-group responses. The data analysis confirms an inter- and intra- group change of attitudes and points to the metacognitive awareness of the experimental group students as far as their notions towards writing are concerned. Moreover, the subjects’ performance was measured in a pre- and post-writing test revealing a statistically significant change of the written capacity of the two groups corroborating, thus, the salience of receiving peer commentary during writing in English as an FL.

Article history

Received
2013-12-11
Accepted
2014-04-23
بحث أصيل كامل

Feedback Revisited: The Impact of Peer Commentary on Students’ Attitudes and Writing Performance in the EFL Classroom

Published
2014-04-23
الصفحات
369 - 402
البحث كاملا

الملخص

The aim of this paper is to delve into young learners’ perceptions towards peer feedback which is used during the applicability of the “process writing” approach in learning English as a foreign language as well as the impact of peer review on their writing performance. To this end, a study was conducted at the sixth grade of two Greek state primary schools involving two experimental (44 students) and two control (46 students) groups. Entry and exit questionnaires were administered to the participants of the study in order to explore their perceptions in the beginning and the end of the research and trace any differences due to the intervention, regarding both inter-group and intra-group responses. The data analysis confirms an inter- and intra- group change of attitudes and points to the metacognitive awareness of the experimental group students as far as their notions towards writing are concerned. Moreover, the subjects’ performance was measured in a pre- and post-writing test revealing a statistically significant change of the written capacity of the two groups corroborating, thus, the salience of receiving peer commentary during writing in English as an FL.

Article history

تاريخ التسليم
2013-12-11
تاريخ القبول
2014-04-23