An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Scopus

Scopus profile and journal metrics

This journal is indexed in Scopus. Use these metrics for a quick publishing snapshot, then open the Scopus page for the authoritative profile.

Scopus
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Indexed in Scopus since 2019
CiteScore 0.9
Indexed since 2019
First decision 10 Days
Submission to acceptance 90 Days
Acceptance to publication 15 Days
Acceptance rate 4%

SCImago

SCImago Journal Rank preview

Use SCImago when you want a quick visual view of the journal ranking profile and external discoverability signals.

An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) SCImago Journal & Country Rank

DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals listing

The DOAJ record is useful for readers, librarians, and authors who want a direct open-access directory entry for the journal.

DOAJ
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) Open directory record
Original full research article

The Effect of Distracters’ Selection Method of Multiple Choice Tests Items on Information Function of the Test

Published
2016-05-12
Pages
1745 - 1766
Full text

Keywords

  • Information Function
  • Multiple choice tests
  • Distractors' selection method

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of distracters’ selection method of multiple choice test items on Information Function. To achieve the objective of the study, the researcher prepared an achievement test for 9th graders consisting in the final format of 41 items. Three different forms of items distracters (A, B, C) were used. The forms were constructed according to three different strategies: form (A) was constructed based on the information taken from teachers, while the items distracters of the second form (B) were constructed by using the statistical analysis and the distracters of form (C) were constructed according to students’ answers. The various forms of the test were applied on sample of 1473 students. The results of the study were analyzed by using SPSS, and BILOG– MG programs. The findings showed that the information function of the test in all the forms were different, and the best information function was in the form (B), then form (C), then form (A), and there was a small difference between the information function for the (A, C) forms, but at different levels of the ability. Moreover, the results revealed that the highest value of the information function was with average students' abilities.

Article history

Received
2015-05-03
Accepted
2016-05-12
بحث أصيل كامل

أثر استراتيجية اختيار المموهات لفقرات اختبارات الاختيار من متعدد على دالة معلومات الاختبار

Published
2016-05-12
الصفحات
1745 - 1766
البحث كاملا

الكلمات الإفتتاحية

  • Information Function
  • Multiple choice tests
  • Distractors' selection method

الملخص

The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of distracters’ selection method of multiple choice test items on Information Function. To achieve the objective of the study, the researcher prepared an achievement test for 9th graders consisting in the final format of 41 items. Three different forms of items distracters (A, B, C) were used. The forms were constructed according to three different strategies: form (A) was constructed based on the information taken from teachers, while the items distracters of the second form (B) were constructed by using the statistical analysis and the distracters of form (C) were constructed according to students’ answers. The various forms of the test were applied on sample of 1473 students. The results of the study were analyzed by using SPSS, and BILOG– MG programs. The findings showed that the information function of the test in all the forms were different, and the best information function was in the form (B), then form (C), then form (A), and there was a small difference between the information function for the (A, C) forms, but at different levels of the ability. Moreover, the results revealed that the highest value of the information function was with average students' abilities.

Article history

تاريخ التسليم
2015-05-03
تاريخ القبول
2016-05-12