Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal. Med. Pharm. J.)

Scopus

Scopus profile and journal metrics

This journal is indexed in Scopus. Use these metrics for a quick publishing snapshot, then open the Scopus page for the authoritative profile.

Scopus
Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal. Med. Pharm. J.) Indexed in Scopus since 2022
CiteScore 1.0
Indexed since 2022
First decision 7 Days
Submission to acceptance 45 Days
Acceptance to publication 14 Days
Acceptance rate 8%

SCImago

SCImago Journal Rank preview

Use SCImago when you want a quick visual view of the journal ranking profile and external discoverability signals.

Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal. Med. Pharm. J.) SCImago Journal & Country Rank

DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals listing

The DOAJ record is useful for readers, librarians, and authors who want a direct open-access directory entry for the journal.

DOAJ
Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal. Med. Pharm. J.) Open directory record
In Press Original full research article

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Technique Among Workers in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Jordan

Published
2025-10-26
Full text

Keywords

  • Jordan
  • KAP;
  • NICU;
  • infants;
  • surfactant;
  • RDS;
  • LISA;
  • preterm

Abstract

Background: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is a technique of giving surfactants through a thin catheter. It has demonstrated potential in improving the respiratory outcomes in premature babies. The aim was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers to using the LISA technique among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) staff in Jordan. Methods: A prospective-observational web-based survey was conducted among 202 NICU staff (general pediatricians, neonatologists, and pediatric residents) from all major health sectors in two Jordanian governorates (Zarqa and Amman). The questionnaire contained 28 demographic, occupational, knowledge, and practice data items. Results: Response rate was 50.5%. Neonatologists were more likely to use LISA (35.1%) than pediatric residents (20.3%) and general pediatricians (43.2%). All LISA users (n = 74, 100%) know the technique, compared to non-users (52.3%) (p < 0.001). The main perceived advantages of LISA were a reduced need for intubation (100% vs. 57.8%) (p < 0.001; OR 57.8, 95% CI 18.9–176.8). And lower risk of airway complications (95.9% vs. 25%) (p < 0.001; OR 57.8, 95% CI 18.9–176.8). The overall knowledge score was significantly higher among LISA users (14.57 ± 3.81) than non-users (10.2 ± 4.95) (p < 0.001; OR 4.37, 95% CI 3.0–5.7). The total score for LISA-specific attitudes and practice was 13.92 ± 3.92. Among non-users, a strong majority (82%) expressed an intention to adopt it in the future. Knowledge score was significantly correlated with practice score (r = 0.320, p = 0.005; 95% CI 0.11–0.52). Conclusions: This study revealed moderate knowledge of LISA among Jordanian NICU staff, while its practice remains limited due to systemic barriers.

Article history

Received
2025-07-16
Accepted
2025-10-10
Available online
2025-10-26
قيد النشر بحث أصيل كامل

-

Published
2025-10-26
البحث كاملا

الكلمات الإفتتاحية

  • Jordan
  • KAP;
  • NICU;
  • infants;
  • surfactant;
  • RDS;
  • LISA;
  • preterm

الملخص

-

Article history

تاريخ التسليم
2025-07-16
تاريخ القبول
2025-10-10
Available online
2025-10-26